Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 01:29:33
Server time: 02:30:26, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Park Formation

Details

Submitted by[?]: Moral Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2463

Description[?]:

If passed, this bill would allow 500 acres of private land to be designated for a National Park in the Kregon region. Substantial compensation for the private owner(s) will be given.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:45:04, September 27, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Greens Party
ToDebating the National Park Formation
MessageWhat/how much private land was the MCP considering for designation?

Date21:57:15, September 27, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the National Park Formation
Messagewe already have national parks. why pass this pet project?

Date01:53:52, September 28, 2007 CET
FromMoral Conservative Party
ToDebating the National Park Formation
MessageThis country can have at least on more national park in which forests and animals can be protected.

Date06:41:25, September 28, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the National Park Formation
Messagehuh? I can't understand what you're saying.

Date19:17:18, September 28, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the National Park Formation
Message1. We already have national parks
2. Government can only seize private property for VITAL projects
3. The method of compensation for eminent domain has already been determined

Date04:18:28, September 29, 2007 CET
FromIndependent Republican Party
ToDebating the National Park Formation
MessageWe would have to agree with the URP on this one. Lodamun ALREADY HAS A NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM. Thus, there is no need for this bill.

Date08:03:51, September 29, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Greens Party
ToDebating the National Park Formation
MessageThe national park system currently in effect is very adequete, by seizing this private property your only going to make the property owners upset.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 139

no
    

Total Seats: 424

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that.

Random quote: "The superior man is distressed by the limitations of his ability; he is not distressed by the fact that men do not recognize the ability that he has." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58