Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 02:08:49
Server time: 01:51:10, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Child Protection

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertà Parti

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2463

Description[?]:

The children of Likatonia represent its future, and therefore should be protected from as much harm as possible.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:06:21, September 27, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Child Protection
MessageIn both cases, we consider these might be steps in constructive directions... although they are babysteps. We may be open to suggestion here.

Date23:40:33, September 27, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
ToDebating the Child Protection
MessageWe support fully Article 2. Article 1 we hold reservations about going back upon previous voting; whilst we do not in theory oppose the proposal, we do not wish to be seen as compromising our progressive and assertive agenda.

We therefore petition the LP to divide this bill into two in the interests of Article 2.

Date04:36:49, September 28, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Child Protection
MessageAye

Date08:33:20, September 28, 2007 CET
FromPermissive Social Union
ToDebating the Child Protection
MessageWe will support.

Date16:10:09, September 29, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Child Protection
MessageThis is a difficult issue, and one in wich it is easy to make a stand without really getting to grips with the facts.

This Bill would make any media depicting non-consensual sex potentially illegal, if they could be described as 'pornographic'. This is regardless of the context, and the consent of all involved.

Whilst we strongly believe that there is rarely justification for such material, the fact that we cannot say never a justification means we have to vote nay.

We would like to see a revised Bill drafted, with the same Articles, but specific details of context and exemption included.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 324

no
  

Total Seats: 195

abstain
 

Total Seats: 147


Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

Random quote: "In an underdeveloped country, don't drink the water; in a developed country, don't breathe the air." - Changing Times magazine

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61