Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 02:31:51
Server time: 01:28:08, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Dx6743 | Harvey Dent | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Food safety guidelines

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Authoritarian Movement

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2468

Description[?]:

There was'nt a real discussion on that, furthermore some parties were absend. That's why I offered this bill again.

There are many people with certain allergies (peanuts is a common example). Big companies produce different types of food within the same factory, which causes a mixture of ingedients in some cases. The consument cannot know about every detail of any product he likes to buy.

Therefore we must ensure, that food is labeled properly, and that the labeled production manners were really applied. One affects the other. That's why I put both proposals in one bill.

Btw: Critical (chemical) ingedrients are not listed on the box too, if no ingriedients were listed at all.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:44:00, September 30, 2007 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Food safety guidelines
Message"Yet again, you assume the market will not make laws that the consumer, not the state, want. To use your example; would a major food corporation really want a dead peanut allergy sufferer's family suing them?

Of course the successful corporations will label their food and prepare it with the safety guidelines that are wanted and relevant to the people who buy it, the consumer. This can only happen through the free market, which your trying to distort."

~Ian Blaire, Shadow Minister of Food and Agriculture for the Liberty Party

Date12:22:53, September 30, 2007 CET
FromNational Authoritarian Movement
ToDebating the Food safety guidelines
Message"If free market means that noone takes care our citizens protecting them from harm, then the NAM is against the free market. We want competition to supply the people with the best and cheapest products. But every competition needs some rules. We can't sacrifice some citizens to let others seperate good from bad products.
We don't know every reason why a company may produce dangerous food. Many scenarios canhappen. Sabotage of competitive products, etc.
Some basic safety guidlines will not harm the free market, but offers security to the people."

Date13:25:36, September 30, 2007 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Food safety guidelines
Message"Sabotage? Even a Communist economy can't account for that. The free market lets citizens take care of themselves, for their own benefit.

Zardugal does not need a nanny state, changing now, after the market has long ago established itself to what the consumers want, would be devastating for the entire industry, especially the whole idea of competition as most underdogs will not be able to comply with the regulations as soon as they're enforced.

We'll give the leading brand a monopoly of the food market for decades to come, cost countless jobs, raise prices and lower quality.

This cannot be allowed to happen."

Ian Blaire


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 123

no
    

Total Seats: 260

abstain
 

Total Seats: 18


Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

Random quote: "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54