Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 00:15:59
Server time: 23:44:00, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Kazulia-Sekowo Free Trade and Mutual Protection Treaty

Details

Submitted by[?]: CSA Communist Party of the DPRK

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2463

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Kazulia-Sekowo Free Trade and Mutual Protection Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:38:01, September 30, 2007 CET
FromPertetuum Kazulia
ToDebating the Ratification of the Kazulia-Sekowo Free Trade and Mutual Protection Treaty
MessageI've no idea why this is beneficial, but I bet it's good for RP purposes.

Date02:03:49, October 01, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Ratification of the Kazulia-Sekowo Free Trade and Mutual Protection Treaty
MessageIndeed it would/wil be good for RP.

That, and Sekowo and Kazulia are the most alike nations of Dovani, so it's sort of natural.

Date04:43:38, October 01, 2007 CET
FromCSA Communist Party of the DPRK
ToDebating the Ratification of the Kazulia-Sekowo Free Trade and Mutual Protection Treaty
Message..would you mind voting yes?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 486

no
 

Total Seats: 89

abstain
    

Total Seats: 137


Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

Random quote: "Power always has to be kept in check; power exercised in secret, especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly dangerous." - William Proxmire

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49