We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pension System Act 2097
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Freedom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2098
Description[?]:
| A proposal to allow optional Private Pension systems. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state operates a compulsory, public pension system.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:17:10, August 18, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pension System Act 2097 |
| Message | I'm proposing this becuase I don't see why the middle and uper classes can't have their own private pension along side the compulsory public pension. If people who can afford to do it, want to save more money for when they are older, then I don't see why the governemnt should stop them, after all, its a private pension and doesn't affect the public pension system nor concern the government. |
| Date | 00:09:37, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Kanjoran People's Party | To | Debating the Pension System Act 2097 |
| Message | I was thinking the same thing myself actually. |
| Date | 15:20:12, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pension System Act 2097 |
| Message | So are there any objections then? |
| Date | 21:54:54, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pension System Act 2097 |
| Message | Why does the SHP vote no? Whats wrong with people putting extra money aside for later in life, well, SHP? |
| Date | 21:55:19, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pension System Act 2097 |
| Message | second question SHP: Do you believe that everyone should have the same wage? |
| Date | 22:56:00, August 20, 2005 CET | From | Secular Humanist Party | To | Debating the Pension System Act 2097 |
| Message | No, but public system doesn't mean that everyone will have tha same. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 352 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 60 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 28 |
| Random fact: Real-life religions should not be referenced in Particracy. Terra has its own religions, many of which mirror real-life ones. See: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Illustrated_Catalogue_of_Religion |
| Random quote: "A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson |