We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence of Tropica (2464)
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2464
Description[?]:
| We have learned that Beiteynu army troops and an air division is being sent to Squibble purposefully to attack our people on Tropica. http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7520&start=120&mforum=particracy We must defend Tropica and our people. Therefore we propose three warships, two aircraft carriers, the 1st-3rd airborne, 4,000 army troops and defence systems be sent to Tropica immediately. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:36:56, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | Agreed. Strongly. |
| Date | 00:48:50, October 02, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | On a second note, have we ever really figured out what our military is comprised of number wise? I mean I know we passed two bills in the past to increase the military, but I don't think we ever figured it out. |
| Date | 00:59:44, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | We have a standing army of 509190 citizens and a reserve of 381893 citizens. Plus, you all have your various militias, which can be rather large(I bet AUP and the fascists have nicely sized ones, I have 44k myself). |
| Date | 01:09:49, October 02, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | The DSP has 13,192 paramilitary members, though they are already split. 3,000 are in Midway. 150 are stationed throughout Kasmenai city 42 are scattered throughout the Eastern-Territories 4,000 are throughout Sekowo. 6,000 are in Tropica. |
| Date | 02:39:39, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | Out of the SCP's own militia, we have: 3000 in Hikhala (centered in Antikleia). 4000 scattered throughout the other four Exarchies. 6000 in the Eastern Territories. 6000 in the Midway Territories. The remaining 25000 are in Tropica. |
| Date | 07:05:33, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Pan-Sekowan Fascist Front | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | We can have militia? Are they entirely RP thing or? I am unable to find a way to recruit some own militia myself. I know our parties have money but I have only found custom polls to spend that money on. |
| Date | 12:32:28, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Saiken Renmei | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | This conflict could lead to a war with Beiteynu, which would be great RP. |
| Date | 12:45:21, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Saiken Renmei | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | One of our party mottos is "Cedant arma togae", and as a consequence we currently oppose the idea of paramilitary organizations and private militias. But we shall fully support battle for the liberty of the Sekowan colonists in Tropica and of all native peoples of Dovani. If the invaders from Beiteynu continue to threat the security of our continent, we shall be forced to ask for the support of all Dovanian nations according to the "Dovani for the Dovanians" treaty. |
| Date | 14:14:12, October 02, 2007 CET | From |  Ma'avak | To | Debating the Defence of Tropica (2464) |
| Message | This conflict could lead to a war with Beiteynu, which would be great RP. OOC: We'd win though! :) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 599 | ||||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "It makes no difference, in principle, if this 'collective will' is divined by the edicts of a dictator or by majority vote, so long as the rights of the individual may still be sacrificed." - Robert Garmong |