We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal defense reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Disunificationist People's Army
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2465
Description[?]:
| If it's for the people, it's tested by the people |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Current: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for any research.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:21:03, October 03, 2007 CET | From |  Ehre und Treue | To | Debating the Animal defense reforms |
| Message | Or not tested and causing cancer and stuff. |
| Date | 21:27:31, October 03, 2007 CET | From | Disunificationist People's Army | To | Debating the Animal defense reforms |
| Message | This is not animal's problem. |
| Date | 01:07:42, October 04, 2007 CET | From | Hulstrian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Animal defense reforms |
| Message | Are you mentally challenged? You realize without animal testing they would have to test products on humans? |
| Date | 02:47:36, October 04, 2007 CET | From | Socialist Party of Greater Hulstria | To | Debating the Animal defense reforms |
| Message | OOC: My personal beliefs have influenced my decision. Card carrying member of the ASPCA. |
| Date | 17:19:15, October 04, 2007 CET | From | Communist-Separatist Party | To | Debating the Animal defense reforms |
| Message | Why do you think that human life is better than animal life? Because you are stupid and an assasin |
| Date | 19:41:34, October 04, 2007 CET | From | Ehre und Treue | To | Debating the Animal defense reforms |
| Message | So if your son is attacked by a lion, you wouldn't kill the lion because his life is worth as much as your son's one? If there's a mosquito that wants to bite you, wouldn't you kill it? If a wild animal had the chance to eat you, would it hesitate, because your life is worth as much as its? Every animal should act according to its nature, and it's human nature to kill animals rather than human beings. |
| Date | 20:46:29, October 04, 2007 CET | From | Communist-Separatist Party | To | Debating the Animal defense reforms |
| Message | you are wrong, you can't compare the use of animals in medical and cosmetic research with a situation in that your life is endangered, a lot of medicines and cosmetic are efectively in animals but human's gens are different and in the most of cases the medicins don't work correct, these are inutil sacrifices, like hunting by sport. you are saying that the animals are made to die |
| Date | 16:25:18, October 05, 2007 CET | From | Ehre und Treue | To | Debating the Animal defense reforms |
| Message | Hunting by sport is in no way different from wild animals killing other animals without need. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 286 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 184 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "For among other evils caused by being disarmed, it renders you contemptible; which is one of those disgraceful things which a prince must guard against." - Niccolo Machiavelli |