Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 00:02:03
Server time: 19:57:56, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | ImperialLodamun | Mbites2 | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Lois de la Défense

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partie Patriotique de Kanjor

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2466

Description[?]:

We feel that in view of the Sekowan military buildup on Squibble and its adjacent islands, we need to increase our defensive capabilities.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:37:09, October 04, 2007 CET
From å¸å›½å…¬æ˜Žå…š (Teikoku KÅmeitÅ)
ToDebating the Lois de la Défense
MessageOOC:
We're not on Squibble itself, just the island(s).

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 167

no
 

Total Seats: 39

abstain
   

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 47