Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 00:55:23
Server time: 23:04:36, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Moderation | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Weapon Concealment and Police Protection Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Cooperative Commonwealth Federation

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2467

Description[?]:

We believe in the Kazulia Independent Party that we need to protect the police officers just as much as we need to protect our average citizens right to assemble. However if a crowd turns violence and turns their attention on innocent civilians or police we cannot stand by and let them act until they tire themselves out. We need to allow the police to disperse such crowds before violence occurs, and if we cannot past legislation to do so I call on all citizens who have lost loved ones to violent demonstrations to sue parties that vote against such an act.

We also need to have weapon openness for such things as a axe, pipe, baseball bat, large weapons that can afflict damage, or death.

Finally we need to allow private citizens to own firearms under a strictly regulated system so that if a violent person attacks them on their job (armoured car security) or at their home they have a weapon of choice. However, it is extremely regulated for the fact to prevent weapons from disappearing

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:34:00, October 04, 2007 CET
FromPertetuum Kazulia
ToDebating the Weapon Concealment and Police Protection Act
MessageArming the citizens of Kazulia is the greatest danger to public safety.

Date19:21:58, October 05, 2007 CET
FromDemokratisk Pacifist Partiet
ToDebating the Weapon Concealment and Police Protection Act
Message1: Agreed. Citizens have a right to be protected from violent groups who try to hide their lawnesses under the guise of free speech.
2: I'd prefer for people to have to carry weapons openly, if they must carry them at all.
3: I'd rather make it so that only people who require firearms for their jobs are allowed to own them, although I can't think of many jobs that truly need their workers to be armed.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 134

no
   

Total Seats: 537

abstain
     

Total Seats: 79


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "This country has far more problems than it deserves and far more solutions than it applies." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58