Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 02:26:24
Server time: 01:33:35, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Vilnius | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.


Notice: Undefined index: EXECUTIVE_LEADER in /var/www/vhosts/particracy.net/subdomains/classic/httpdocs/viewbill.php on line 234

Bill: Private School Regulation

Details

Submitted by[?]: removed

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2039

Description[?]:

In order to ensure that all students recieve an sufficient education, it is hereby proposed that private schools be heavily regulated and licenced with the aim of guarunteeing the quality of education. While supplimental studies will be permitted and even encouraged, all private schools must reach a certain baseline in order to maintain their government licence.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Datenot recorded
From Libertarian Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageOppose oppose oppose. Not the state's right to regulate a PRIVATE institution such as this. There are public schools that are alternatives and while we support a privatized education system, we'll concede to a private-public system so long as private schools aren't regulated.

Datenot recorded
From Deadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageI oppose this proposal also. I believe that the current system is fine.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageAgreed, they are alternatives to the state system, but the state has a responcibility to the children tio give them the best education possible. A child who goes to a fundimentalist school and spends time learning relgious claptrap rather than mathematics is going to be at a severe disadvantage compared to someone who went through the state system. Rather than regulating what is taught, we simply wisih to make sure that all schools achieve the same minimum standard of performance.

Datenot recorded
From Libertarian Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageThat child can then proceed, after going to that school, to get a proper education. It's not the government's business to interfere.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageOne of the government's responcibilites is to level the playing field so that everyone has an equal chance. Allowing insane parents to disadvantage their children is not acceptable

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageFurther, government regulation and licencing would ensure that the school is safe and that the teachers are well qualified for their jobs

Datenot recorded
From Libertarian Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageEveryone does have an equal chance. You have the chance to go to public or private schools. Private schools that do not succeed in educating students will thus fail..

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageNot at all... your parents decide what school you go to. Some religious schools, despite having inferior teaching, still manage to succeed. I don't see what your objection is, since government regulation will force private schools to perform better, thereby attracting a larger population. Education is a primary function of government, and government must have a say in the running of private schools.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageWe will support this proposal.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageSupport!

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessagePssht. Simple solution: Standardised national tests. Then publicly publish the rankings. Capitalism!

Datenot recorded
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageI'll support this proposal. And I'm against published rankings, because schools will only teach kids the things that are asked for in those tests, which is not proper education.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageWell? Make better tests. What are you paying them for, anyway? To sit around and do nothing?

Datenot recorded
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageTests are an evaluation at one specific moment, they don't measure the intelligence nor knowledge of the student well.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageDepends on the test. I went through the IB system and had a 5 hour math exam that tested every bloody thing I knew (and a lot I didn't). nyway, I think we have a majority. Moving to voting!

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageEven these tests can not judge everything. And it would force a very detailled schedule on every school. If a school wants to teach integration by Romberg instead of using the 100'000 rules, it wouldn't be possible.

Datenot recorded
From Libertarian Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Private School Regulation
MessageThe thing is, education is for the individual, not the government. That is why we should give them choice instead of regulation and privacy infringement.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 15

no
  

Total Seats: 22

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 88