We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Organisation of Local Governments Plan
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Urban Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2469
Description[?]:
... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for any reason.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Firefighting services.
Old value:: There is a national fire department, funded by the government.
Current: There is a national fire department, funded by the government.
Proposed: Fire prevention and management is left to the local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: The state owns and maintains all housing.
Current: The state contracts with private companies to provide public housing.
Proposed: Housing policy is to be determined by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:08:45, October 09, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | Local governments=bad. |
Date | 19:41:24, October 09, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | I agree, too, but you see, the majority of citizens in Kafuristan are federalists.... |
Date | 19:55:10, October 09, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | So? |
Date | 19:55:48, October 09, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | Hello...? Ehem, seats...? |
Date | 20:00:40, October 09, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | We don't decide how to vote based on what the people want. We base them on what we believe. If this results in fewer votes, so be it. |
Date | 05:35:44, October 10, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | Well, I would personally like to experience something more. Anyway, whatever |
Date | 05:48:13, October 10, 2007 CET | From | The Kuchifey Liberation Party (KLC) | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | Federalists dislike federal power? |
Date | 14:05:45, October 10, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | Federalists like federal power, unitarists love to have the power gathered in one national body, the State. |
Date | 01:37:09, October 12, 2007 CET | From | National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Organisation of Local Governments Plan |
Message | Depends on US federalism or Global federalism. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 270 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 105 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 130 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "Aristocracy and exclusiveness tend to final overthrow, in language as in politics." - W. D. Whitney |