Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 02:29:18
Server time: 09:30:41, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Defending Squibble

Details

Submitted by[?]: HaLeumit Tikvah

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2469

Description[?]:

http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=145562
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=145510

"Sekowos territorial ambitions knows no bounds. We propose we respond in turn and request that the Naczelnik Nasi double our naval presence in the region also, as well as sending the fourth air division to join the 1st-3rd (ooc: if im remembering correctly and thats what we have there.) air divisions in the region. We regret that more Beiteynuese citizens must be sent half way around the World, but to protect our brother in Squibble such actions are neccessary."

-Itamar Eitam

ooc: just as a note, i think that, as the Sanhedrin has already approved Operation Homeland Expansion, giving the Naczelnik Nasi power to deploy any troops he sees fit to Squibble in the operation, this bill will only require the RNPs support, but other parties support will reduce war weariness and increase the effectivness of troops.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:26:13, October 10, 2007 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
MessageAs minister of Defence, I allow this, We must defend Squibble!

Date20:17:25, October 10, 2007 CET
FromHaLeumit Tikvah
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
Message"Exactly what are the reasons behind the MVPs decision to vote against? Would you rather we were caught underprepared if the Sekowo declaration of war is passed? Honestly, this is treachery against the brave Beiteynuese troops, and will not be soon forgotten.

Remember, this is only a reaction to Sekowo increasing its presence. We are not pushing for war in this bill, just the forces to defend if we are attacked."

-Itamar Eitam

Date20:22:32, October 10, 2007 CET
FromRobotic Anarcho Syndicalistic Party
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
Message"We see no logical course but to be prepared to defend."

Date23:19:04, October 10, 2007 CET
FromProgressive Zionist Party
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
MessageIt seems we have no option as to whether or not to be prepared. However, it is the ruling governments' responsibility to avert war, and we expect them to fulfill it.

Date02:35:20, October 11, 2007 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
MessageMVP is an Anti-Jewish Homeland Party! All that it votes yes on is laws that break down our Moral or Defence.

Date06:28:45, October 11, 2007 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
MessageLOOK AT THIS:

Date06:33:53, October 11, 2007 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
Messagehttp://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=146062

Date11:26:07, October 11, 2007 CET
FromNrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
MessageAs this is concern us then we would like to get a chance response to the CZP message.

We failed to see the connection between our discussion for the FTA or Non Aggression Pact with Sekowo and the Squibble Conflict. It's a completely different matter therefore, we would like to be leave out of this discussion.

We also questioning the discussion to closed the migrant pass which is an international water according to the Law of the Sea and call for an immideate withdrawl from the pass.

-- Matthew Roberts, Chancellor of Foreign Affairs

Date11:34:38, October 11, 2007 CET
From Ma'avak
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
Message"Beiteynu does not recognise the Law of the Sea."

-- Yair Moshe Berkovic, Minister of Foreign Affairs

Date13:16:07, October 11, 2007 CET
FromNrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Defending Squibble
Message"That is totally beside the point seeing that Darnussia recognise the Law of the Sea and the Darnussia-Beiteynu Mutual Defence Agreement didn't state any possible intervention of darnussia in this matter meaning that the Migrant Pass which lies through Darnussia is an international water and will remain open in this matter.

We also warn any ships of any nation that if fired upon Pontesian Ship. Pontesi will use its extensive military resources to retaliate."

-- Matthew Roberts, Chancellor of Foreign Affairs

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 206

no
 

Total Seats: 34

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "The only place where democracy comes before work is in the dictionary." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71