We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2470
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kafuri Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2470
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the The Kuchifey Liberation Party (KLC)
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the The Kuchifey Liberation Party (KLC)
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the The Kuchifey Liberation Party (KLC)
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Kafuri Socialist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the The Kuchifey Liberation Party (KLC)
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Kafuri Socialist Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the The Kuchifey Liberation Party (KLC)
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Kafuri Socialist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:42:48, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | Certainly not; we all need to participate! |
| Date | 09:45:36, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | This was to get the NAP out of the cabinet quickly. |
| Date | 09:46:50, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | Not fair and certainly anti-democratic. But, "this was"? |
| Date | 09:53:03, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | I voted against it, because the NAP said it was unfair. Which is correct. Anti-democratic? Why? Because I wanted to get this one passed quickly so I only included parties likely to be online soon? |
| Date | 09:59:32, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | Hm...if civil war does arrive, a cabinet will do nothing. Besides, someone will resign and we may face early elections. Media are free if you noticed. |
| Date | 10:05:35, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | Ah, yes the cabinet will. It will be used to determine how much of the national army sides with each side. Read the terms the NAP provided. Last three lines specifically. I believe there are 5 different parties in the cabinet right now. LDS, KPP, RGP, KSP and NAP. If all of those parties declare for the side I expect them to, the NAP will receive 20% of the national army. If this bill passes before the civil war bill voting ends, the NAP would receive nothing. Unless I misunderstood the terms. This bill is unfair because I expect the NAP to be outnumbered already and taking his 20% of the national army makes the numbers difference even worse. Any resignations should wait until after the war bill is passed/defeated. Why would we have early elections? It would be stupid of us (the leftists) to vote for early elections. |
| Date | 10:09:17, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | Would it be? Anyway, 20% certainly does matter. Let's have a realistic civil war if we are going to have a war at all. |
| Date | 10:09:45, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | That would be way I decided not to vote for this after all... |
| Date | 10:10:26, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | True(*smiley face*) |
| Date | 01:57:48, October 15, 2007 CET | From |  National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | Not really. I would still receive something because I would argue that I was in the cabinet when the bill was proposed, and simply because conditions change does not change the matter. |
| Date | 05:36:05, October 15, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2470 |
| Message | Eh, whatever. Doesn't matter now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 446 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 59 |
| Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum! |
| Random quote: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." - Bill Clinton |