Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 01:42:03
Server time: 10:17:56, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): LC73DunMHP | Moderation | rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Citizens' Right to Assembly

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Ecosocialist Movement

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2471

Description[?]:

Restricting this basic right prevents full freedom of expression.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:12:05, October 15, 2007 CET
From Hobrazian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Citizens' Right to Assembly
MessageWe disagree.

Date22:06:53, October 15, 2007 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Citizens' Right to Assembly
MessageThe people have the right to assemble, and the We Say So! Party supports the rights of those people who wish to assemble in groups millions large, should they wish it, so long as it is peaceful and not a risk to public safety. However, if there is a potential risk to safety the police must be empowered to act in defence of the security of the citizenry and the groups themselves.

Date23:35:10, October 15, 2007 CET
From Hobrazian Federalist Party
ToDebating the Citizens' Right to Assembly
MessageThe April '57 Movement holds the view that the people will soon have to confront the Second Imperial Republic and its evil by force. This bill shall help with the downfall of such an evil state, and thus we completely and utterly support it.

Date12:45:39, October 16, 2007 CET
From The Family First Party
ToDebating the Citizens' Right to Assembly
MessageFamily First prefers the status quo. We must ensure that dangerous groups of individuals may be legally dispersed if they pose a threat to the innocent public, and we see absolutely no reason why the HEM would have any qualm with this. Any further restriction on the capacity of police officers to ensure justice and public safety would be ludicrous and quite frankly foolish.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 247

no
   

Total Seats: 142

abstain
 

Total Seats: 11


Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra.

Random quote: "I took the initiative in creating the internet." - Al Gore

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60