Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 00:55:31
Server time: 23:04:28, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Moderation | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Senate Resolution 38: Progression for the Advancement of Citizens' Safety and Civil Liberties Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Independent Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2472

Description[?]:

Legislation fighting to progress naturally given civil liberties.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:31:21, October 17, 2007 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 38: Progression for the Advancement of Citizens' Safety and Civil Liberties Act
MessageThe Conservatives have no official stance on Abortion, as it is seen as a more Ethics-based debate rather than a governmental policy, therfore we shall support any legislation that the senate desires to make upon it.

Article 2 seems to be a reasonable comprimise between putting trust back into the Solentian youth and keeping the purchase of alcohol from being used in an irrisponsible manor.

Article 3 is highly controversial, however as a general rule, the wording selected seems to be adequate to solving issues with it.

We are however, very much against Article 4 and shall not be supporting free drug use except for medicinal purposes.

We inquire as to why the FIP chooses to reccomend Article 5. Was there a problem with the smoking ban implaced by the Labour Party not so long ago?

Amanda Beauchamp, Party Deputy, Senate Warden.

Date20:33:04, October 17, 2007 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 38: Progression for the Advancement of Citizens' Safety and Civil Liberties Act
MessageAs the FP is clearly still sorting out their bill, we retract our previous statement and shall place a new one when they are finished, hwoever our policies outlined above, still stand.

A.Beauchamp, Deputy Party Leader, Senate Warden.

Date21:07:17, October 17, 2007 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 38: Progression for the Advancement of Citizens' Safety and Civil Liberties Act
MessageAfter reading articles 5, 6, 7 and 8, we oppose.

It would seem the FIP do not know what their own policies anymore.

Sir Thomas Hill, Party Leader, Supreme President.

Date21:24:57, October 17, 2007 CET
From Federal Independent Party
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 38: Progression for the Advancement of Citizens' Safety and Civil Liberties Act
MessageIt's called a change in heart and politics Mr. President. As the oldest and longest serving party in the Federal Republic, as well as its founders, we understand the importance of being able to change ideology for whatever the reason it may be. This time it is prompted by the sight of the ugliness of a forsaken ideology.

FIP Senate Speaker Thiris Andronicus

Date22:02:44, October 17, 2007 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 38: Progression for the Advancement of Citizens' Safety and Civil Liberties Act
MessageOf course Mr.Speaker, the Conservatives understand changes to policy and agenda, such is expected, however such a radical change from right to left? How odd.

Sir Thomas Hill, Party Leader, Solentian President.

Date23:06:10, October 17, 2007 CET
From Labour Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 38: Progression for the Advancement of Citizens' Safety and Civil Liberties Act
MessageWe have to agree with the Conservatives on this one, it looks as though the FIP have performed U-Turns on many of their policies. We also don't agree any more with their new ones as we did for their old ones, simply because we know the laws the FIP are now trying to pass, they veoted in the first place. This is something I hope the electorate remembers at the next election, There are only two strong and real left wing parties- the FIP isn't one of them.

Alistair Marriot, Labour Party Leader

Date02:34:56, October 19, 2007 CET
From Workers Party
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 38: Progression for the Advancement of Citizens' Safety and Civil Liberties Act
MessageWe disagree with some of the proposed articles.

But at a time in which democracy is under attack in Solentia, we must back this proposal as a whole, in order to resist the erosion of our rights as workers and citizens.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 172

no
    

Total Seats: 220

abstain
  

Total Seats: 33


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 103