We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Travail, mon cherie, travail!
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Pour Un Movement Populaire
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2473
Description[?]:
| Why can't our children work in environments that are both safe and conducive to later career oppurtunities? I see no reason why children shouldn't be allowed to work if they so desire. Providing that we regulate this field strictly, nothing could go wrong. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning child labour.
Old value:: Child labour is forbidden.
Current: Child labour is forbidden.
Proposed: Child labour is allowed, but with additional regulations to those of adult labourers.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:16:06, October 18, 2007 CET | From |  2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Travail, mon cherie, travail! |
| Message | Capitalist pigs! Children need to be educated, not put to work in the coal pits of greed and industry! Besides, children don't get much freedom anyways so we don't feel too bad about the restriction of liberties. |
| Date | 03:10:25, October 18, 2007 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Travail, mon cherie, travail! |
| Message | that hurts us. deep in the soul. |
| Date | 07:06:47, October 19, 2007 CET | From | La partie modérée très extrême | To | Debating the Travail, mon cherie, travail! |
| Message | child labor is ALLOWED not mandatory. |
| Date | 00:59:00, October 20, 2007 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Travail, mon cherie, travail! |
| Message | Ca c'est ridicule. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 93 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 157 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it. " - Ann Coulter |