We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Women's Liberation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hulstrian Conservative Monarchist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2473
Description[?]:
The family in this country is not what it should be, and the masculinity of our nation's male citizens (a precious resource in wartime and peacetime) is not what it should be either. These proposed changes alter the status and position of the genders in the nation, with an aim at improving the nation's Citizenry, and their usefulness to themselves and society as a whole. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the initiation of divorces (if allowed).
Old value:: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Current: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Proposed: Only male partners may initiate a divorce.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve in segregated units.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women have no place in the military.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Women's working rights.
Old value:: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Current: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Proposed: Women are only allowed to work in part time jobs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:58:56, October 18, 2007 CET | From | Gao-Showa Imperial Party | To | Debating the Women's Liberation |
Message | OOC: lol |
Date | 06:05:08, October 18, 2007 CET | From | Hulstrian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Women's Liberation |
Message | While our party is misogynistic as the next, we disagree with this law. |
Date | 06:25:59, October 18, 2007 CET | From | Hulstrian Conservative Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Women's Liberation |
Message | Does the illustrious representative of the HNP wish any form of compromise, or is any divergence from the established order unacceptable, with regards to this bill? |
Date | 07:17:51, October 18, 2007 CET | From | Hulstrian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Women's Liberation |
Message | We are opposed to all of these changes. The HNP doesn't believe in the oppression of woman, and if woman wish to work, of fight for our nation we believe they should be able to. We apologize if our policy isn't conservative enough for you, but to be honest, we care about this country, and these changes don't serve its interests in any way whatsoever. |
Date | 16:45:21, October 18, 2007 CET | From | Hulstrian Conservative Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Women's Liberation |
Message | So your party do not support making the army as strong as it could be? Women are inferior fighters, and women working full-time assaults the Family Unit, which in turn reduces the population growth, which means less men to join the army. |
Date | 00:07:54, October 19, 2007 CET | From | Hulstrian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Women's Liberation |
Message | Thats a good point. However, we still disagree with Article 1. Reintroduce the bill without that article and you'll have our support. |
Date | 03:17:59, October 19, 2007 CET | From | Civic and Economic Liberty | To | Debating the Women's Liberation |
Message | Women are not inferior fighters! A modern army doesn't just use grunt force. Women are skillful at seducing the enemy, among other things. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 400 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 100 |
Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed. |
Random quote: "It is the hallmark of great society to debate and disagree without resorting to violence." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician |