Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 03:00:06
Server time: 16:59:53, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | albaniansunited | Arusu-Gad | Arusu-Weareback | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales

Details

Submitted by[?]: HaLeumit Tikvah

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2494

Description[?]:

WHEREAS the Accord has repelled invasion of Beiteynu in the past.

WHEREAS Beiteynus natural alliance with Accord nations has seen several members offer military aid without requirement to do so.

WHILE we should accept that Accord members will have no requirement to involve themselves in our current conflict with Pontesi

LET IT BE ENACTED that Beiteynu should rejoin the Accord des Nations Amicales.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:41:10, October 19, 2007 CET
FromHaLeumit Tikvah
ToDebating the Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales
Message"Before putting this to vote, we would like to hear the opinions of the other parties in the Sanhedrin. We feel that, while we have only withdrawn from the alliance recently, current events have shown the danger of not being part of this purely defensive alliance."

-Nesí Hamdiná Itamar Eitam

Date01:02:02, October 20, 2007 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales
MessageI love the idea! Que Dieu bénisse l'Accord

Date19:05:54, October 20, 2007 CET
FromRed Anarchy Faction
ToDebating the Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales
MessageWe oppose

Date20:03:07, October 20, 2007 CET
FromHaLeumit Tikvah
ToDebating the Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales
Message"My apologies, I should have been clearer; I meant all Beiteynuese parties opinions."

--Nesí Hamdiná Itamar Eitam

Date17:15:48, October 27, 2007 CET
From Ma'avak
ToDebating the Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales
Message"We note that when the foreign devils pushed through the depature for the Accord the Parti d'Aristocratie of Rildanor stated "it should be noted that any Accord member reserves the right to veto a nation's entry and re-entry to alliance, which includes Beiteynu" Perhaps before we consider this we should enquire as to whether the Homeland would even be welcomed back to the alliance?"

-- Raziela Aharoni

Date17:22:43, October 27, 2007 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales
Message"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting that vote."
--John Hegee

Date05:37:05, November 03, 2007 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales
MessageBeiteynu's re-entry to the Accord is being discussed: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/vieworganization.php?organizationid=688

It should be noted that Beiteynu should not simply return to the alliance for its advantage against its war with Pontesi. We urge the country to seek peace.

Date15:07:07, November 30, 2007 CET
FromHaLeumit Tikvah
ToDebating the Ratification of the Accord des Nations Amicales
Message"While it was my party who proposed this bill, our views on the merits of the Accord have changed. While we shall not forget the times it has come to our aid, it has shown itself to be weak when Beiteynu was threatened due to electoral fraud and influenece from within. Of course we had valued allies within the Accord, Darnussia and Jelbania being the most prominent, we already have a seperate mutual protection pact wih Darnussia, who have also since chosen to leave the Accord, and our party shall always support us sending aid should Jelbania find itself threatened. On the whole the Accord seems to be losing support in Majatra, with Cobura inevitable exit leaving just Jelbania the lone member in Majatra and shrinking back to its original scope of Southern Seleya, and we would prefer to focus on building link with nations in the MCTO. We shall put this to vote regardless, and although I do not support it, will accept the Knesset wishes on this matter.

-Nesí Hamdiná Moshe Ne-anyahu

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 176

no
  

Total Seats: 125

abstain
   

Total Seats: 59


Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players.

Random quote: "It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64