We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Urban Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2476
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:36:56, October 24, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | Why? You said you wanted an alliance! |
Date | 17:43:22, October 24, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | Where does this say anything about an alliance? This just says we're friends, exposes our society to non-Majatran culture and opens our markets to Sekowo. Do we even have anything to export? Where are we gaining anything in this? I voted for the Lourennian treaty because it was vague. We can work on the details later and develop a good treaty. But this is less vague, and doesn't have anything that actually helps Kafuristan. These types of things shouldn't be done by just one party. A debate period would be a good idea. |
Date | 17:45:47, October 24, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | This draft has been accepted by Sekowo. I accept this as well because you see, this is vague as well, since it doesn't specify and point or pinpoint other aspects. It's just a friendship. |
Date | 17:46:08, October 24, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | Another proposal would satisfy you, something like the Kafuristan-Lourenne Treaty? |
Date | 17:54:16, October 24, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | Or this one minus free-trade. What parties are you in discussions with in Sekowo? The next treaty should be debated before being proposed. What is the point of ratifying drafts anyway? Why don't we just have a thread where the current version of the treaty is debated, in both nations until a final draft is developed? Do we even have a navy anymore? The Deltarians sold ours didn't they? |
Date | 17:55:27, October 24, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | Em..ok, I shall start a Conference tommorow. |
Date | 17:59:36, October 24, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | I don't mean a forum conference, just a bill proposal that stays in debate mode. So all parties can say what they want in a treaty like this. Most of us don't go to the forum. |
Date | 18:05:40, October 24, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | Ok then, i shall create a bill and post this treaty and the Lourenne model, ok? |
Date | 15:42:54, October 25, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Kafuristan-Sekowo Friendship Treaty |
Message | Perhaps not... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 214 | |||
no | Total Seats: 191 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 100 |
Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady |