We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Democratic Workers' Party Manifesto Amendments
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2477
Description[?]:
This bill frees the People from religious oppression in the dictation of how to dress, and proposes to outlaw the wearing of religious clothing and symbols in public buildings, i.e. governmental buildings, schools, and hospitals (this applies to health workers only). This bill recognises the role religion plays in modern Likatonian society, whilst at the same time limiting its influence to that which any healthy hobby would have. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: People are required to dress according to religious codes
Current: Wearing religious clothing or religious symbols in public is illegal.
Proposed: It is not permitted to wear religious clothing or religious symbols in public buildings.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:29:53, October 26, 2007 CET | From | Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei | To | Debating the Democratic Workers' Party Manifesto Amendments |
Message | This bill is the SO-CALLED "choice" of a "Lesser of 2 evils," so to speak. The current law is a Theocracy while the proposed is FORCED secularism (which is a religion as well). Therefore, we will ABSTAIN since it prohibits the FREE EXERCISE of religious garb by democratically-elected public officials. In other words, if Immeressen's Prophet wishes to wear a cloth around his head, that is is his RIGHT so as long as the representatives of the DWP or myself is FORCED to wear that garb. |
Date | 13:51:23, October 27, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List | To | Debating the Democratic Workers' Party Manifesto Amendments |
Message | We presume the CWFP mean that we are *not* forced to wear the aforementioned religious garment? |
Date | 18:43:44, October 27, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Democratic Workers' Party Manifesto Amendments |
Message | Since our God is actually among us, how is it even logical to pretend there is no need for religious garb? If people want to pretend there is no Immeressen, than can do it in the privacy of their own homes, where no one else has to see it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 248 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 224 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 194 |
Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |