We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forestry Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Greens Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2478
Description[?]:
| This bill will re-introduce necessary protection for wild life and maintain natural eco-systems by protecting Lodamese forests. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: The government has no policy on forest protection.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:49:43, October 27, 2007 CET | From | The Common People's Party | To | Debating the Forestry Protection Act |
| Message | ill support |
| Date | 16:52:51, October 27, 2007 CET | From | Lodamese Labour Workers Party | To | Debating the Forestry Protection Act |
| Message | We support |
| Date | 01:53:51, October 28, 2007 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Forestry Protection Act |
| Message | So we're going to nationalize millions of acres of private forest. Why should we support this massively expensive proposal? |
| Date | 15:47:25, October 28, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Forestry Protection Act |
| Message | we support |
| Date | 21:44:13, October 29, 2007 CET | From | Solvo Probus Secui | To | Debating the Forestry Protection Act |
| Message | Put the replacement at a higher level then logging, and cut out Article 3. Then we will agree. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 51 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 39 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 10 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates." - Jay Leno |