Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 00:44:05
Server time: 07:15:54, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: '77 Tradition and Freedom Alliance

Details

Submitted by[?]: Saiken Renmei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2478

Description[?]:

The '77 TFA is an Ad Hoc political alliance formed to restore and maintain the traditional liberties and values of the Sekowan nation against the attacks of leftist and secularist demagogic parties. The parties that belong to the '77 Tradition and Freedom Alliance wish to maintain the current status quo of our old and powerful religion, support the traditional family structure as the basis of society, and believe in the conservation of our nation's strength, all these without affecting the liberties and civic rights of the Sekowan population.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:34:54, October 29, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the '77 Tradition and Freedom Alliance
MessageWe scoff at this asinine proposal.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 143

no
  

Total Seats: 158

abstain
     

Total Seats: 298


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement." - Leon Trotsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57