We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Les Enfants
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Pour Un Movement Populaire
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2480
Description[?]:
We cannot allow ourselves to default on the promises of democracy to our children. Thereby we must make available contraceptives to secure that people do not have children they cannot take care of. Thereby we must ensure that the government gives benefits to all of our children, regardless of their parents backrounds; because although mother and father may be rich, that doesn't mean they necessarily care about their kids. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: The state guarantees child benefit to both low-income families and large families.
Current: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on subsidising contraception.
Old value:: The government does not supply free or discounted contraceptives.
Current: The government does not supply free or discounted contraceptives.
Proposed: The government offers free contraceptives in pharmacies and public toilets.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:09:42, November 01, 2007 CET | From | Parti Libertaire | To | Debating the Les Enfants |
Message | While your good intentions are laudable, we can no support this. Handouts are against our philosophy, as they take away from others. |
Date | 00:58:50, November 02, 2007 CET | From | 2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Les Enfants |
Message | You've got the wrong name, PU. Handouts are at the core of liberalism, and we are in full support of them... for the sake of peace and progress! |
Date | 02:05:43, November 02, 2007 CET | From | La partie modérée très extrême | To | Debating the Les Enfants |
Message | sounds reasonable |
Date | 04:01:50, November 02, 2007 CET | From | Partie Patriotique de Kanjor | To | Debating the Les Enfants |
Message | Another attempt at welfare for the rich... |
Date | 04:06:22, November 02, 2007 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Les Enfants |
Message | Which you would no doubtly benefit from. . . |
Date | 09:18:08, November 02, 2007 CET | From | Union Pour une Nation Homosexuelle | To | Debating the Les Enfants |
Message | Handouts are against the very nature of true liberalism, odd how social democracy and liberalism always seem to be confused. |
Date | 09:43:52, November 02, 2007 CET | From | 2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Les Enfants |
Message | Call it what you will, but social democracy is where it's at. |
Date | 11:59:39, November 02, 2007 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Les Enfants |
Message | . . . Yeah. What he said. On that note, want some governement money? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 100 | |||
no | Total Seats: 79 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 71 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Politics is the system of depriving the proletariat of their power." - Karl Marx |