Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 01:08:35
Server time: 02:51:24, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Honouring mother and baby

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union of Progressive Ulama

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2102

Description[?]:

An opinion poll was held among the citizens of the Sultanate of Al'Badara. The subject of the opinion poll was The right to perform an abortion for a pregnant woman. When asked what their opinions were, the following choices were made:Percentage Choice
20.20% All abortions are illegal.
29.12% Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
20.65% Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
17.02% Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
13.01% Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.

Abortions are to be permitted only in cases of medical emergency, to save the mother's life.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:28:54, August 22, 2005 CET
FromPurity Party
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
MessageWe strongly support this.

Date15:30:15, August 22, 2005 CET
FromImperial Socialist Party
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
MessageA "Baby" isn't a "baby" until birth. There is no medical evidence to suggest the fetus is "alive" before birth. A woman's body is hers and hers alone. What basis do we have to dictate whether or not a woman can make a choice about her body? The answer is simple: There is no basis whatsoever for anyone besides the woman to decide whether or not she wants to bear the fetus.

Forcing a woman to endure pregnancy is nothing short of modern day slavery. While my party has no seats yet, we strongly oppose this proposal, and we implore those with seats to take a stand and defend a woman's right to her own body.

Date15:31:09, August 22, 2005 CET
FromImperial Socialist Party
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
MessageA "Baby" isn't a "baby" until birth. There is no medical evidence to suggest the fetus is "alive" before birth. A woman's body is hers and hers alone. What basis do we have to dictate whether or not a woman can make a choice about her body? The answer is simple: There is no basis whatsoever for anyone besides the woman to decide whether or not she wants to bear the fetus.

Forcing a woman to endure pregnancy is nothing short of modern day slavery. While my party has no seats yet, we strongly oppose this proposal, and we implore those with seats to take a stand and defend a woman's right to her own body.

Date15:34:34, August 22, 2005 CET
FromImperial Socialist Party
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
Message*Somehow my message was posted twice. I apologize for that.

Date19:54:26, August 22, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Liberal Coalition
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
MessageWe are against this bill.

Date20:50:06, August 22, 2005 CET
FromImperial Socialist Party
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
MessageThe Imperial Socialist Party thanks the Sultan's Loyalist Party for opposing this God-Awful piece of legislation.

Date08:34:24, August 23, 2005 CET
FromPurity Party
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
MessageThis piece of legislation protects the lives of the unborn. The Imperial Socialist Party claim that until a baby is born they are not alive - this is patently untrue. Naturally, babies which are carried to term are carried far beyond the necessary point of viability. If they could survive on their own outside a womb it is abusrd to say they are not alive. It is nonsense to suggest that the spark of life comes when a baby first enters air instead of its mother. We believe in the sanctity of human life, and condemn the evil, wicked murderers who wish loose women to kill at will.

Date17:30:27, August 24, 2005 CET
FromImperial Socialist Party
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
Message"Protecting the lives of the unborn" is a contradiction. If the unborn are alive, they'd be born. There is no scientific evidence to support the claim a group of cells, or a fetus constitutes life. Forcing women to carry an unwanted fetus is nothing short of slavery. The Imperial Socialist Party believes in the sanctity of life as well. We believe in protecting the life of the living. We oppose the Death Penalty in all cases. A Fetus is not alive. It cannot think, it cannot walk, it cannot speak. It is nothing but an object within the Mother until birth, when it becomes alive. The burden of proof lies on the shoulder of those trying prove a fetus is alive, not those protecting the rights of women to discard an unwanted fetus.


Date12:14:25, August 28, 2005 CET
FromAl'Badaran Bolshevik Movement (SC)
ToDebating the Honouring mother and baby
MessageThis is an infringement on a woman's life and privacy. We are against this and would strongly support a counter-proposal, that abortion be allowed throughout the whole course of the pregnancy.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 63

no
  

Total Seats: 0

abstain
     

Total Seats: 74


Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "There is no problem that cannot be solved with diplomacy or debate. Anyone who thinks otherwise does not need a gun, but a direct ride to a mental health clinic." - Ascentio Cartaginese, former Istalian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65