We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kafuri Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2481
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the League of Nuclear Nations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:19:57, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations |
| Message | Pointless... |
| Date | 21:20:37, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations |
| Message | Your opinion. |
| Date | 21:23:10, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations |
| Message | Why? We both know that our current laws will NEVER change. All parties in Kafuristan want the laws to remain as they are. |
| Date | 21:24:04, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations |
| Message | Will there never be new parties? We had had quite a few before the current parties arrived. |
| Date | 21:25:35, November 03, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations |
| Message | Well, you remain, the NAP, RP, KPP, LDS, and perhaps NRP is in favour. That's the majority which seems it will stay for long that way. |
| Date | 00:58:04, November 04, 2007 CET | From | Moderate Kafuri Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations |
| Message | We will be abstaining. While a good treaty, it will be impossible to prevent someone from breaking the treaty. |
| Date | 07:47:12, November 04, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the League of Nuclear Nations |
| Message | That's a reason as well. I am quite happy that MKP agrees with the rest of us on the matters of defense. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 102 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 79 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 334 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "The only people who would be hurt by abandoning the Kyoto Protocol would be several thousand people who make a living attending conferences on global warming." - Kirill Kondratyev |