We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2481
Description[?]:
An act to change policy with regard to nuclear weapons. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:35:55, November 04, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act |
Message | This we'll support 100% |
Date | 17:15:27, November 04, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act |
Message | As do we. The current aw is far too lenient. The use of nuclear weapons shouldn't be taken lightly |
Date | 22:55:16, November 04, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act |
Message | No they shouldn't be taken lightly. |
Date | 05:13:23, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act |
Message | We officially vote Yes. |
Date | 19:52:03, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act |
Message | Defeated :( |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 225 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 274 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
Random quote: "Anarchism is not a romantic fable but the hardheaded realization, based on five thousand years of experience, that we cannot entrust the management of our lives to kings, priests, politicians, generals, and county commissioners." - Edward Abbey |