We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forestry Agencies
Details
Submitted by[?]: Irish Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2482
Description[?]:
| A national agency working side-by-side with commercial ones will be more effective. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:30:53, November 04, 2007 CET | From | National Authoritarian Movement | To | Debating the Forestry Agencies |
| Message | "To be honest, we see no advantages at all for both laws, the current and the proposed one. Therefore we should leave it as is." |
| Date | 07:07:36, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Forestry Agencies |
| Message | "The current law allows for dense woodland covered Provinces to deregulate logging, while environmentally sensitive areas will have their Provincial governments set appropriate laws." ~Camile Jefferys, Shadow Environment and Tourism Minister |
| Date | 22:28:29, November 05, 2007 CET | From | Hauthorn Party | To | Debating the Forestry Agencies |
| Message | We are in support of letting local governments regulate their affairs to the maximum extent practical. They know what's best for their area of the country, and we see no reason to impose a national organization on those local governments when there is no good reason. |
| Date | 07:13:09, November 06, 2007 CET | From | National Authoritarian Movement | To | Debating the Forestry Agencies |
| Message | "Forestry is one of the aspects I would leave up for the local gouvernment. But we can talk about realigning capacities on other subjects." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 69 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 332 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365 |
| Random quote: "Aristocracy and exclusiveness tend to final overthrow, in language as in politics." - W. D. Whitney |