We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2099
Details
Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2100
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Protectorate Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Protectorate Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Leviathan Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the LibCom Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the LibCom Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Protectorate Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the United Labour Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Leviathan Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:53:43, August 23, 2005 CET | From | Leviathan Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2099 |
| Message | We do not trust the LCP to responsibly administer the Ministry of Economic Affairs, given their proclivity towards unnecesary spending. We doubly do not trust them with the Ministry of Defense, given their extreme pacificism. |
| Date | 17:41:16, August 23, 2005 CET | From | United Labour Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2099 |
| Message | I would have voted against this so that LeP was Economics Minister, but as he left me out of his cabinet proposal, to hell with him. Support! |
| Date | 00:54:13, August 24, 2005 CET | From | LibCom Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2099 |
| Message | We're not pacifists at all, despite our anti-nuclear stance. Nevertheless, the other cabinet proposal is acceptable. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 47 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 53 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
| Random quote: "What is conservatism? Is it not the adherence to the old and tried against the new and untried?" - Abraham Lincoln |