We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution
Details
Submitted by[?]: Wessex High Imperial Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2482
Description[?]:
| Friends: WHEREAS The UU party has been sent word from the Jakanian Head of Government, Mr George Falco, asking when Pontesi would like peacekeeping forces sent into Tadraki to help alleviate the current war there and to prevent nuclear annihilation. Apparently, Jakania barely passed the measure allowing peacekeeping troops to be sent. WHEREAS This is the response I sent to Mr. Falco (more to this bill following the UU response: _________ To Mr. Falco: We have not heard from our Atabeg Accipitrum or Chancellor of Foreign Affairs for a while--the nuclear warhead bill proposed by the EPRP is still in debate and has NOT been forwarded to vote. We find hope in this. In the meantime, I will again propose, through the Utopian Universalist Party, a cease-fire in Tadraki and request permission from our August Parliament of the Cedar Throne to invite the peacekeeping force into the area as a co-occupant alongside Pontesian troups. This is as far as we feel comfortable going without discussing the matter with our Atabeg Accipitrum directly. Please be at the ready to co-occupy. Signed, Simon Templar, Chancellor of Internal Affairs Co-signed Portia di Venicci, Chancellor of Justice Nicolas Copernicus, Chancellor of Science and Technology Magister Ludi Joseph Knecht, Chancellor of Education and Culture [Sir] Thomas More, Head of the Utopian Universalist Party of Pontesi ________ WHEREAS You will note in Chancellor Templar's response his express unwillingness to speak for our Atabeg Accipitrum or for our parliament. The UU party is therefore once again asking the August Parliament of the Cedar Throne to pass a bill allowing the MCTO to send peacekeeping forces into Tadraki to co-occupy the country with Pontesi to maintain the ceasefire issued also herein until such time as the peace conference begins. Therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that a cease fire be issued in Tadraki if all warring parties in Tadraki agree to a cease fire, and that this cease fire be issued from the warring parties to our government directly. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that Pontesi allow peacekeeping forces from Jakania to co-occupy Tadraki with Pontesi troops. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the peace talks commence as soon as possible. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that Pontesi proper make welcome an ambassador from the MCTO to stay in a hotel of modest means in LERNA under the protection of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, paid for by the Ministry of Finance--that is, if the ambassador so wishes to come to our country. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:29:31, November 06, 2007 CET | From |  Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | The Social Democratic Party believes that what had been a regional war for the protection of a minority population within Beiteynu is very near becoming a nuclear war involving several countries. It is time for sensible heads to prevail and peace to be negotiated. We propose one amendment to the above resolution, that a cease fire can only be issued when all warring parties agree. Pontesi cannot disarm until it has the assurances of other countries that they will as well. We do believe that a Jakanian peacekeeping force would be a welcome addition to Tadraki if only as a deterrent to other invading forces. |
| Date | 06:29:48, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Wessex High Imperial Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | The UU party agrees with the SDP and will alter the resolution accordingly. |
| Date | 06:32:23, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Wessex High Imperial Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | The proposed ammendment by the SDP to this resolution has been made. Are there any other comments to be made before we advance the resolution to vote? |
| Date | 06:38:39, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | We have yet to recieve a confirmation that Gran Tadraki will become the free state under the neutral protection of Jakania peacekeeper from Beitenyu. We must wait for the response until the Beitenyu government accept that offered. |
| Date | 08:04:18, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Wessex High Imperial Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | Can we, however, still pass this resolution since it states explicity that this is a cease fire only as long as all parties involved agree to stand down and that it initiates peace talks? There is nothing in this resolution that says that peace will be the eventual outcome of the talks, just that they will begin--we consider this right action and a good faith display. |
| Date | 17:07:11, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | We see this as a good step. Didn't we agreed that Gran Tadraki become a full neutral zone, not an area of co-occupation because I remember they were not to happy about co-occupy and would treat us as aggressors. But it did look like that they would settle for a international peacekeeping force for Gran Tadraki, but they wanted political control, I said nope, just because its a 'neutral zone'. Those are just my thoughts. The Beiteynu government has stepped down to use nuclear force against you. I agreed with the ETPRP, the Beiteynu government hasn't really said anything recently, your resolution might be jumping the gun. |
| Date | 21:29:59, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Wessex High Imperial Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | Yes, the area is to a neutral zone, that is fine with the UU party--but we will defer to the EPRP on this matter and await confirmation of this addendum by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. -- [Sir] Thomas More |
| Date | 23:48:04, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | I think we should put it on hold first. |
| Date | 01:36:48, November 07, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | Jakanian Military Aircraft: "This is JAK 2345-089, we request our fleet of 150 aircraft transports entry into Pontesian airspace" "Fighter escorts, break formation and head back to the 5th Fleet, the Pontesians agreed to escort us." |
| Date | 08:33:34, November 07, 2007 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | Pontesian Air Command Centre, Heierlark Airbase: "JAK 2345-089 , this is AC 101. You're authorise to enter the region, five DX 22-A squadron from the will accompany you to the airfield. AC 101, out." Razgriz Squadron, 15th Air Division, 101th Tactical Fighter Squadron. "JAK 2345-089, please maintain your current altitude and speed until you reach the destination. Razgriz 1 out. |
| Date | 16:24:14, November 07, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | JAK 2345-089: "Roger that, AC 101, JAK flight out" To 101st "We shall maintain current altitude and speed, JAK flight out. "Airmen, maintain speed of 540 mph at 32,000 ft. until we reach the Pontesian Airbase." |
| Date | 14:53:09, November 08, 2007 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | Pontesian Air Command Centre, Heierlark Airbase: "JAK 2345-089, you are clear for landing on runway one, I repeat runway one. Please proceed on landing one by one until all aircraft are landed. The 101st Tactical Fighter Squadron will remain with you until all aircraft are landed. AC 101, out." |
| Date | 18:13:27, November 09, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Peacekeeping Co-Occupation Resolution |
| Message | Jakanian Miltary C-17 Globemaster Transport Flight: JAK 2345-089: "JAK 2345-089 copies that PACC. We are at 6,000 ft. and vectoring into Heierlark landing airspace. Our aircraft will be in airborne transit at 5,000 ft before start of landing. Thanks for escort from the 101st." To other aircraft "This is JAK 2345-089, our aircraft will land one by one, proceed to Heielark airborne transit area to await your landings in an orderly fashion." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 335 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 95 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 195 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "Difference of religion breeds more quarrels than difference of politics." - Wendell Phillips |