We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Withdraw the environmentalist bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Science and Environment Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2483
Description[?]:
Kazulia is the only country who comply with and consequently has ratified the environmentalist bill. We propose it is withdrawn and rewritten so it could make a difference and make sense as an international treaty |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the The environmentalist bill.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:17:48, November 06, 2007 CET | From | CSA Communist Party of the DPRK | To | Debating the Withdraw the environmentalist bill |
Message | why do you have ENVRIONMENT in oyur treaty? |
Date | 22:23:15, November 06, 2007 CET | From | Science and Environment Party | To | Debating the Withdraw the environmentalist bill |
Message | Because the party cares and not only dreams about change. What is the point having a treaty with so many articles that nobody else can join? It is like forming a club where only yourself can be a member. Is that the kind of ego ideology values the LSP stands for? Skip the treaty and you can write up a new one that others than our natoin can ratify. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 620 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 130 |
Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
Random quote: "If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin." - Charles Darwin |