We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Less Government Act of 2483 (Part II)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2483
Description[?]:
Less Government Act of 2483 (Part II) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers carry standard firearms.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:06:34, November 08, 2007 CET | From | Alorian Free Democrats | To | Debating the Less Government Act of 2483 (Part II) |
Message | How is this even remotely related to "Less Government". Has the MLP just become too lazy and institutionalized after a century of existence to give a reasoned argument? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 245 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 369 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 86 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself." - Thomas Paine |