Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 02:38:53
Server time: 01:21:06, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military and Civil Defense Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Federalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2485

Description[?]:

A proposal to modernize and profesionalize our Army and to secure that our war industries aren't used against us.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:00:44, November 09, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Federalist Party
ToDebating the Military and Civil Defense Bill
MessageThis bill is a good one, and we fully support it as a blockade against the tyrannical, anti-federalist views of the other parties.

Date20:40:12, November 09, 2007 CET
FromPartai Komunis Hobrazia
ToDebating the Military and Civil Defense Bill
MessageWe support this bill fully.

Date21:34:01, November 09, 2007 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Military and Civil Defense Bill
MessageWe support article 4 as being sensible for national security and may be convinced, should adequate arguments be made, to support article 3 however, for national security reasons, we cannot accept articles 1 and 2.

Date14:18:55, November 10, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Federalist Party
ToDebating the Military and Civil Defense Bill
MessageWe understand that a conscript army is always worse than a profesional one. Anyway, a minimun training to our people and the posibility to call them in war times should resolve the problem of lack of manpower, if it appears.

About the use of chemicals or biological weapons. Are we really thinking on use them in an ofensive? We don't propose abandon them, we only think they shouldn't be used as an ofensive weapon.

Date15:29:32, November 11, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Federalist Party
ToDebating the Military and Civil Defense Bill
MessageWe have deleted article 1, which was the most disturbing on the debate.

Date18:16:49, November 11, 2007 CET
FromHobrazia Deltarians Party
ToDebating the Military and Civil Defense Bill
MessageSue us, but we support.

Date20:39:48, November 11, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Military and Civil Defense Bill
MessageI disagree with this bill as it will lessen our ability to defend ourselves in the event of an attack. The proposed measures in our opinion do not go far enough to protect our people from foreign agression. We have recently proposed a bill on article 3 which we believe provides the most logical answer to the arms dealing question.

Date14:44:03, November 12, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Federalist Party
ToDebating the Military and Civil Defense Bill
MessageWe present it again, because the voting was interrupt by the elections.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 95

no
    

Total Seats: 305

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "The Lord is a man of war" - Exodus 15:3

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 84