Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 00:34:34
Server time: 19:25:25, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | DanivonX | HopesFor | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom of the Press Act #1

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2485

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:32:14, November 11, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
MessageWe would support this Bill, if it were re-submitted with a caveat that a second station was provided for the Emissary to...communicate....with her people, in a frank and uncensored way.

Date15:03:03, November 11, 2007 CET
FromKapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
Message
Immeressence, this bill DOES do that!!! The Emissary is part of the Executive Branch of GOVERNMENT while the Convocation is of the Legislative Branch.

This bill establishes a national media for the GOVERNMENT to communicate to the people PLUS the ability for private citizens to establish their own media voices in competition.

Date15:08:19, November 11, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
MessageI think the CWFP misses the subtle implication...

Date17:16:03, November 11, 2007 CET
FromKapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
Message
Please, educate me, Drang on the subtle implication that I missed(haha)?

Date17:17:25, November 11, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
MessageThe operative phrasing in the Immeressen, Inc statement, was the word 'uncensored'.

At risk of invoking the Montoya Principle on you, "I do not think it means what you think it means".

Date17:18:47, November 11, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
MessageInconceivable!

Date17:21:28, November 11, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
MessageNo more rhyming now, I mean it.

Date17:37:12, November 11, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
MessageI believe that the additional station could be run for peanuts. Anybody want a peanut?

Date19:28:00, November 11, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
ToDebating the Freedom of the Press Act #1
MessageThe DWP is allergic to peanuts and considers this statement offensive.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 41

no
   

Total Seats: 50

abstain
  

Total Seats: 9


Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password.

Random quote: "I believe that guns don't kill people, husbands that come home early do." - Larry the Cable Guy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65