We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Riddance Of Ostensible Farces Act I (ROOF Act I)
Details
Submitted by[?]: SocLib '82
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2485
Description[?]:
A rather mundane bill, but who said politics was all fame and glamor?! Small it may seem, the ability for the average Joe to go buy Sparky and not have to register him and create a hassle for himself and his family will certainly be welcome. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the ownership of domestic animals as pets.
Old value:: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Current: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding domestic animal ownership.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:20:39, November 11, 2007 CET | From | SocLib '82 | To | Debating the Riddance Of Ostensible Farces Act I (ROOF Act I) |
Message | Any objections? |
Date | 10:21:34, November 11, 2007 CET | From | Hutorian Anarcho-Communist Party | To | Debating the Riddance Of Ostensible Farces Act I (ROOF Act I) |
Message | We disagree simply because this means vicious animals cannot be tracked back to dangerous owners. We could not convict someone of raising and beating an animal if there was no registration of the animal. |
Date | 13:46:10, November 11, 2007 CET | From | "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party | To | Debating the Riddance Of Ostensible Farces Act I (ROOF Act I) |
Message | There are special laws concerning wild and dangerous animals anyway. We agree... |
Date | 22:11:30, November 11, 2007 CET | From | Hutorian Anarcho-Communist Party | To | Debating the Riddance Of Ostensible Farces Act I (ROOF Act I) |
Message | Giving it some thought, we rescind our previous remarks. Agreed. |
Date | 23:51:58, November 11, 2007 CET | From | Royalist Confederacy | To | Debating the Riddance Of Ostensible Farces Act I (ROOF Act I) |
Message | Agreed, there's no need for government to get involved in ownership of animals, those are thing just like furniture... |
Date | 23:58:32, November 11, 2007 CET | From | Hutorian Anarcho-Communist Party | To | Debating the Riddance Of Ostensible Farces Act I (ROOF Act I) |
Message | However, we contest with the Royalist Confederacy for those remarks. Animals are living, breathing things. Not furniture. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 301 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
Random quote: "Anarchy stands for the liberation of the human mind from the domination of religion, the liberation of the human body from the domination of property, liberation from the shackles and restraints of government." - Emma Goldman |