We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, October 2484
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Labor Confederation
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: June 2485
Description[?]:
| We, the Red Panther Faction, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:51:15, November 12, 2007 CET | From | Radical Labor Confederation | To | Debating the Call for early elections, October 2484 |
| Message | We must make up lost seats in Parliament with the shutting down of the Militarist Party, and of the recent increase in seats from 600 to 750. |
| Date | 04:53:04, November 12, 2007 CET | From | Supporters of Science in Design (IP) | To | Debating the Call for early elections, October 2484 |
| Message | We intend to change our vote to Yes in November. We have one piece of legislation that we wish to see the voting on finished. After which we whole heartedly support new elections. |
| Date | 12:20:09, November 12, 2007 CET | From | Radical Labor Confederation | To | Debating the Call for early elections, October 2484 |
| Message | May the Panthers ask why the New Conservatives vote against early elections? |
| Date | 13:22:24, November 12, 2007 CET | From | New Conservative Party of Malivia | To | Debating the Call for early elections, October 2484 |
| Message | We vote on whims. And now we're too lazy to change our vote. |
| Date | 02:25:36, November 13, 2007 CET | From | Radical Labor Confederation | To | Debating the Call for early elections, October 2484 |
| Message | How about the Gerajan Imperials? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 286 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 81 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 175 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne |