Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 02:04:17
Server time: 09:55:42, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | SocDemDundorfian | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Food Regulation (Vendor Licensing) Amendment Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2486

Description[?]:

An act to require food vendors to be licensed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:27:57, November 12, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Food Regulation (Vendor Licensing) Amendment Act
MessageWe already recognise the importance of regulating shelf lives of food, and this is right, for food is a common avenue for infection. It only stands to reason that we limit sale to those who can prove that they will safely prepare and store the same food. Should a butcher who admittedly stores meat in the open air at room temperature be allowed to sell that meat, as long as it is still within its shelf life? Of course not.

Date14:41:50, November 12, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Food Regulation (Vendor Licensing) Amendment Act
MessageOpposed

Date12:52:53, November 13, 2007 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Food Regulation (Vendor Licensing) Amendment Act
MessageOpposed. You tell me why girl scouts selling coockies should have a license..

Date11:51:22, November 14, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Food Regulation (Vendor Licensing) Amendment Act
MessageSo we can be sure the cookies aren't negligently manufactured of course.

Date12:38:40, November 14, 2007 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Food Regulation (Vendor Licensing) Amendment Act
MessageThat's what food standards are for. You're talking about production now, not the sales of food. And our current food safety policy clearly states "The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions"

Date13:56:48, November 14, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Food Regulation (Vendor Licensing) Amendment Act
Messagelol.

Date21:44:47, November 14, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Food Regulation (Vendor Licensing) Amendment Act
MessagePassed

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 256

no
     

Total Seats: 243

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

    Random quote: "Voting Tory will cause your wife to have bigger breasts and increase your chances of owning a BMW M3." - Boris Johnson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58