Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 00:33:32
Server time: 19:26:27, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Klexi | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Royalist Confederacy

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2486

Description[?]:

In the Name of God Almighty!

In order to ensure our independace we should develop and be ready to use nuclear, biological and chemical weaponry. Other nations are already bulding or possesing ABC weaponry.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:54:51, November 12, 2007 CET
FromHutorian Anarcho-Communist Party
ToDebating the Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.
MessageWe disagree with the policy of using chemical weapons for any reason. Otherwise, we see no reason not to pass it.

Date15:00:57, November 12, 2007 CET
FromRoyalist Confederacy
ToDebating the Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.
MessageSo we propose using chemical/biological weapons in case of chemical and/or biological atack on our territory.

Date15:17:07, November 12, 2007 CET
From"Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
ToDebating the Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.
Message"No. Weapons of mass destruction are false and inhuman. Pure destruction and perversion, and that is what we are storing when we are storing weapons of mass destruction, are against every thinkable human maxim. Of course, every construction includes destruction but destruction for the sake of destruction is the meanest possible action a man can take..."

Ephrajm Chajm Dichter, party leader

Date15:33:34, November 12, 2007 CET
FromRoyalist Confederacy
ToDebating the Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.
MessageWe have to be secure, nuclear weapons will make wars less likely, no one would like to be hit by our retailation. Does HICP agree on our proposition?

Date21:50:16, November 12, 2007 CET
FromHutorian Anarcho-Communist Party
ToDebating the Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.
MessageGood enough for us.

Date23:02:48, November 12, 2007 CET
FromSocLib '82
ToDebating the Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.
MessageThis will be disastrous for Hutori. I urge with the greatest alarm the other parties to not support this bill. It will pave the way for destruction and inhumanity.

Date09:45:48, November 13, 2007 CET
FromHutorian Revolutionist's Party
ToDebating the Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.
MessageI completely agree with the Foyalist Confederacy. The protection of our wonderful nation should be up held at what ever costs even if it means building nuclear weapons

Date09:46:15, November 13, 2007 CET
FromHutorian Revolutionist's Party
ToDebating the Royalist Policy of Deterrence Act.
MessageRoyalist*

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 175

no
    

Total Seats: 126

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Random quote: "Only the educated are free." - Epictetus

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 84