Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 00:47:38
Server time: 03:12:21, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ethical Progress; A new stance.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Coalition for National Unity [CNU]

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2485

Description[?]:

We wish to re-evaluate the current level of progress being made by this nation, whilst simultaneously maintaining a balance of morals, ethics and a stable social society.

This programme shall be the first part of a series, to re-vamp Solentian Ethics through the progressive steps being made, towards the future of Terra!

Sir Thomas Hill, Supreme President.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:05:20, November 12, 2007 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Ethical Progress; A new stance.
MessageThis first section of our programme, shall focus on Health Issues, and shall hope to develop our understanding of what is acceptable to permit, in the name of democracy.

Currently, on average, well over 100 abortions occur each day. That is 100 potential citizens and Solentian slaughtered each day with the consent and permission of this government.

Now, we do not, by any means wish to take away human rights, the right to choice is essential. However, we DO see a need to prioritise those rights, and we feel that the right to live, is more important than the right to kill in the name of compassion.

We want to see a fair system be implimented, allowing only those ABSOLUTLY neccassary cases to be those, which see abortion occur. Those that are NOT 100% essential, should not be carried out.

Let us make this bill possbible, let us agree that whilst Abortion is controversial, life is not.

-Sir Thomas Hill, Supreme President.

Date21:13:11, November 12, 2007 CET
From Meritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the Ethical Progress; A new stance.
MessageThere are some potential lives that would be unhelpful to the state; the weak, the mutated, children of rape and foreign parentage. With that in mind we support a woman's and state's official's choices to abort pregnancies.

We will be voting on on this issue.

Sen. Bloch

Date21:35:31, November 12, 2007 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Ethical Progress; A new stance.
MessageAs you wish Senator.

-Amanda Beauchamp; Prime Minister.

Date01:54:59, November 13, 2007 CET
From Workers Party
ToDebating the Ethical Progress; A new stance.
MessageIf the Conservatives trust women to take care of their children, how do they not trust them when it comes to decide if they want a children or not?

Marilyn Monroe da Silva - Workers Party Senate Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 112

no
     

Total Seats: 282

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented

    Random quote: "It will be years, not in my time, before a woman will become Prime Minister." - Margaret Thatcher

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 55