Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 00:13:04
Server time: 11:46:55, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): New Thought | RogueALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Health Offensive 1

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Authoritarian Movement

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2487

Description[?]:

The government seems to be inactive, that's why we have to offer changes which advance the situation of the people.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:13:04, November 13, 2007 CET
From Irish Party
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
MessageWe agree, since this is exactly what we proposed not so long ago.

Date06:01:33, November 14, 2007 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
Message" 1: No reason
2: Tax payers should not be expected to pay for some teenage love affair
3: The people who buy the products will decide whether they want this regulation or not through the products they buy
4: Same as before
5: Not only will this drown small business but it will take away business's and consumer's right to choice"

Date08:51:12, November 14, 2007 CET
From National Authoritarian Movement
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
MessageHow can a customer decide, if he gets no information at all?
Concerning your critics on #5: Do you really think one single consumer will choosedangerous food?

Date06:47:28, November 15, 2007 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
Message"A consumer who would like information will buy a product with information."

OOC: I don't understand the second question

Date07:01:29, November 15, 2007 CET
From National Authoritarian Movement
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
MessageOOC: The government food-safety guidelines have a reason. They ban things which are proved to be dangerous. You said, everybody should choose on its own. But to be honest, do you really think one single person would buy a product which is dangerous, if he knows this fact? That's why your explanation makes no sense, since nobody would ever choose such a product.

Anyway, Is there a chance to get your support on any proposal?

Date12:08:21, November 15, 2007 CET
From Ancient and Noble Order of the Cavaliers
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
Message[Monocle falls to the floor]
My word! This is far too much nationalisation!

Date20:12:52, November 15, 2007 CET
From National Authoritarian Movement
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
MessageI deleted proposal 1 and 2 in the hope to get more support now.

Date18:16:30, November 16, 2007 CET
From Irish Party
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
MessageDisappointed that you got rid of the contraceptives part. But you still get a yes from us.

Date23:37:23, November 16, 2007 CET
From National Authoritarian Movement
ToDebating the Health Offensive 1
MessageThats democracy. You have to abloish ideas in order to find a compromise.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 173

no
   

Total Seats: 174

abstain
 

Total Seats: 54


Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side).

Random quote: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75