We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Income tax proposal of July 2485
Details
Submitted by[?]: Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2487
Description[?]:
The Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the United Tribes of Tukarali. |
Proposals
Article 1
We propose to alter income tax brackets to the following setup. Information about the current income tax system can be found here.
Bracket | Tax | Estimated Revenue |
> 75,000 TUK | 20% | 227,519,000,000 TUK |
> 100,000 TUK | 25% | 375,447,000,000 TUK |
> 150,000 TUK | 30% | 279,593,000,000 TUK |
> 200,000 TUK | 40% | 612,685,000,000 TUK | Total | 1,495,244,000,000 TUK |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:25:16, November 13, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2485 |
Message | I created a larger non-taxed bracket (75000 in stead of 60000) to support the poorest in our society. I also split up the previous massive categorie (140,000 TUK ~ 33% ~ 1,476,344,699,061 TUK) into two smaller ones: ("150,000 TUK ~ 30% ~ 470,947,000,000 TUK" and "200,000 TUK ~ 40% ~ 999,175,000,000 TUK). It's still is a big big, but I'm open for suggestions.. |
Date | 19:36:25, November 13, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2485 |
Message | Opposed for the same reason that we oppose the other bill. We prefer a flat tax |
Date | 12:17:25, November 14, 2007 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2485 |
Message | We don't see any reason to oppose this, though, nor do we see much reason to support it either (apart from the non-taxed bracket). We feel there isn't anything wrong with having most tax income coming from a single bracket. |
Date | 17:09:22, November 16, 2007 CET | From | Red Hammer Council | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2485 |
Message | You have our support. |
Date | 22:41:10, November 16, 2007 CET | From | Flemish Liberation Front | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2485 |
Message | opposed cuz we just don't like your party. |
Date | 22:55:06, November 16, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of July 2485 |
Message | Meh. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 290 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 128 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 81 |
Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
Random quote: "What we are doing to the forests of the world is but a mirror reflection of what we are doing to ourselves and to one another." - Gandhi |