Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 01:19:21
Server time: 06:40:38, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Park Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: We Say So! Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2487

Description[?]:

In order to guarantee clean, accessible access to natural greenery and protection of sites deemed to be of importance to protected species as well as providing areas for public relaxation and entertainment, the Government will actively support a national network of parks and mariners designed to provide green spaces thoughout the Country.
The Government will work in conjunction with both local and national community leaders to guarantee that the areas designated for these parks and mariners will provide the best quality possible for public access as well as the protection of species within these ecosystems.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:04:47, November 16, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Hobrazia
ToDebating the National Park Act
MessageWe believe that this is an unnecessary drain on public funds. The system as it is quite sufficent.

Date19:43:30, November 16, 2007 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the National Park Act
MessageThe system does not guarantee green space for the people and as such is not adequate for this nation. We must provide this as it will improve public health and increase tourism both of which are good for this nation and, more importantly, will lead to reduced public expenditure in the long term due to decreased public health requirement spending.

Date20:28:14, November 16, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Federalist Party
ToDebating the National Park Act
MessageThe tyrannical "We Say So!" Party is attempting to reverse the gains the AGA has made, as they know our gains have worked.

Date20:51:10, November 16, 2007 CET
FromPartai Komunis Hobrazia
ToDebating the National Park Act
MessageThe Communist party says this is a drain on public funds, yet it will increase tourism, fishing, and hunting, and it will decrease medical costs. The result? More tax money that it takes to preserve the forests. A drain? No. It's a pump, not a drain--it pumps money into the coffers of the government while increasing services to the people. Perhaps the Communist Party ought to say, think, before they vote.

Date15:37:26, November 17, 2007 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the National Park Act
MessageActually we are attempting to reverse the damage the A-GA has caused and is causing to our national identity and the damage to the environment of this Country which will have knock on effects for decades to come.
We're here for the long haul assisting all Hobrazians, are they?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 190

no
  

Total Seats: 95

abstain
  

Total Seats: 115


Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61