We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Park Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: We Say So! Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2487
Description[?]:
In order to guarantee clean, accessible access to natural greenery and protection of sites deemed to be of importance to protected species as well as providing areas for public relaxation and entertainment, the Government will actively support a national network of parks and mariners designed to provide green spaces thoughout the Country. The Government will work in conjunction with both local and national community leaders to guarantee that the areas designated for these parks and mariners will provide the best quality possible for public access as well as the protection of species within these ecosystems. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:04:47, November 16, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the National Park Act |
Message | We believe that this is an unnecessary drain on public funds. The system as it is quite sufficent. |
Date | 19:43:30, November 16, 2007 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the National Park Act |
Message | The system does not guarantee green space for the people and as such is not adequate for this nation. We must provide this as it will improve public health and increase tourism both of which are good for this nation and, more importantly, will lead to reduced public expenditure in the long term due to decreased public health requirement spending. |
Date | 20:28:14, November 16, 2007 CET | From | Hobrazian Federalist Party | To | Debating the National Park Act |
Message | The tyrannical "We Say So!" Party is attempting to reverse the gains the AGA has made, as they know our gains have worked. |
Date | 20:51:10, November 16, 2007 CET | From | Partai Komunis Hobrazia | To | Debating the National Park Act |
Message | The Communist party says this is a drain on public funds, yet it will increase tourism, fishing, and hunting, and it will decrease medical costs. The result? More tax money that it takes to preserve the forests. A drain? No. It's a pump, not a drain--it pumps money into the coffers of the government while increasing services to the people. Perhaps the Communist Party ought to say, think, before they vote. |
Date | 15:37:26, November 17, 2007 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the National Park Act |
Message | Actually we are attempting to reverse the damage the A-GA has caused and is causing to our national identity and the damage to the environment of this Country which will have knock on effects for decades to come. We're here for the long haul assisting all Hobrazians, are they? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 190 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 95 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 115 |
Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader |