Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 02:43:56
Server time: 17:16:03, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): dannypk19 | Mbites2 | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The People's Cabinet

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Anarchist Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2488

Description[?]:

The People have spoken in the election. They have told us that the time has come for a change. We must stand up for the People with renewed vigor.

(If you don't like the cabinet positions I proposed, tell me how you would like them to be changed. Also, if your party is not included in this proposed cabinet but would like to join the government, let me know what you would want).

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:10:19, November 18, 2007 CET
FromParti de Garde Royales
ToDebating the The People's Cabinet
Message((I would like Foreign Affairs, as I have just started on deliberations with other nations regarding various economical and territorial questions, and of course HoG, but I'm probably not gonna get that))

Date11:32:04, November 18, 2007 CET
FromProgressive Party
ToDebating the The People's Cabinet
Message((I thought we were in agreement that the HoG won't be the same with the HoS. Minister of defence is my main desired post, I've started working on a Orbat))

Date11:35:06, November 18, 2007 CET
FromProgressive Party
ToDebating the The People's Cabinet
Message((Meh, that's what happens when you post with your eyes closed. We have so many democratic parties. ^^'))

Date14:03:49, November 18, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Conservative party
ToDebating the The People's Cabinet
Messagesince we am new to this we would be happy to take on any ministry to get our feet wet as they say. of course since we do not have a lot of mandates we understand that we are not in a strong potition to negotiate.

if we where to list our preferences they would be trade and Industry, Justice, Foreign affairs, Internal Affairs, Defence, Science and Technology in that order.

Date14:36:48, November 18, 2007 CET
FromLourenne Democratic Party
ToDebating the The People's Cabinet
MessageWe would like to keep Foreign Affairs, but we don't mind trading Defense for Justice with the Progressive Party.

Sen. Maria Hutchinson (D - NK),
Democratic Party Whip

Date14:58:26, November 18, 2007 CET
FromNational Atheist Party
ToDebating the The People's Cabinet
MessageThe least I would have expected is to keep the Ministries I already have (Infrastructure and Transport, Health and Social Services and Enviroment and Tourism).

Date17:18:08, November 18, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic & socialist Party (PDyS)
ToDebating the The People's Cabinet
MessageThe PdyS accept the head of governemt and , though, the PDyS desire the ministries of science & tecnology and enviroment and tourism.
Eventhough, we accept the cabinet will accept for the senate for we keep the stability of the state

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 38

no
      

Total Seats: 143

abstain
 

Total Seats: 19


Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

Random quote: "I've been against the death penalty since I was in law school in 1950. It's horrible, discriminatory, and undermines the credibility of the criminal justice system." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73