Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 4516
Next month in: 03:49:02
Server time: 16:10:57, January 16, 2019 CET
Currently online (5): Digger | Guillame_Darlan | jknevar | Rosa Luxemburg | weezzelle | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: 100 Parliamentary Seats 2

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2101

Description[?]:

I think this may pass....no?

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:38:30, August 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
MessageOkay, if FFF votes in favor of this, I predict that we will barely win.

If FFF votes against this, I predict that we will lose this by two seats.

So....FFF is the swing vote here.

Date01:47:30, August 25, 2005 CET
FromChinkopodian Economic Democrats
ToDebating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
Message200 is fine for now.

Date01:48:56, August 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
MessageOh...DAMMIT you weren't supposed to vote against it.

Date02:31:31, August 25, 2005 CET
FromFedralist for Freedom. (FFF)
ToDebating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
MessageHrmm I could swing this well state the upside and the downside. I honestly don'tno and I won't Abstain so if your against it Plead you case and if you for it plead yours honestly I think less seats would be worse for my small party because the other parties will gulp up most but I could squeeze out alot to so plead your cases.

Date02:39:05, August 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
MessageNo....never mind...Chink voted it down.

Date02:59:40, August 25, 2005 CET
FromFedralist for Freedom. (FFF)
ToDebating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
Messagewe could still take it hav ye faith

Date05:55:31, August 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
MessageWe need at least 134 seats to pass the bill. 90 have already voted nay.

Date16:23:34, August 25, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
Messagec'mon this is far less represantive...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 44

no
      

Total Seats: 133

abstain
 

Total Seats: 23


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker).

Random quote: <script type="text/javascript"> google_ad_client = "ca-pub-2385483047681341"; google_ad_slot = "8054645962"; google_ad_width = 728; google_ad_height = 90; </script> <!-- Test --> <script type="text/javascript" src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script>"civil disobedience. . . is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. . Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem." - Howard Zinn

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61