We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: 100 Parliamentary Seats 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2101
Description[?]:
| I think this may pass....no? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 200
Current: 150
Proposed: 100
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:38:30, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2 |
| Message | Okay, if FFF votes in favor of this, I predict that we will barely win. If FFF votes against this, I predict that we will lose this by two seats. So....FFF is the swing vote here. |
| Date | 01:47:30, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2 |
| Message | 200 is fine for now. |
| Date | 01:48:56, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2 |
| Message | Oh...DAMMIT you weren't supposed to vote against it. |
| Date | 02:31:31, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Fedralist for Freedom. (FFF) | To | Debating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2 |
| Message | Hrmm I could swing this well state the upside and the downside. I honestly don'tno and I won't Abstain so if your against it Plead you case and if you for it plead yours honestly I think less seats would be worse for my small party because the other parties will gulp up most but I could squeeze out alot to so plead your cases. |
| Date | 02:39:05, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2 |
| Message | No....never mind...Chink voted it down. |
| Date | 02:59:40, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Fedralist for Freedom. (FFF) | To | Debating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2 |
| Message | we could still take it hav ye faith |
| Date | 05:55:31, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2 |
| Message | We need at least 134 seats to pass the bill. 90 have already voted nay. |
| Date | 16:23:34, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 100 Parliamentary Seats 2 |
| Message | c'mon this is far less represantive... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 44 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 133 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 23 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw |