We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Restriction of Civil Liberties; Part 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Democrats of Jakania
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2488
Description[?]:
Limitation of Civil Liberties |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of slavery.
Old value:: Slavery and the slave trade are illegal.
Current: Slavery and the slave trade are illegal.
Proposed: Slavery and the slave trade is allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relations are only legal for procreation.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Women's working rights.
Old value:: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Current: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Proposed: Women are not allowed to work. The state requires them to stay at home.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:39:46, November 19, 2007 CET | From | Scientific Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Restriction of Civil Liberties; Part 2 |
Message | Huh. The country's been taken over by evil. How peculiar. |
Date | 20:52:21, November 19, 2007 CET | From | Birleşik Demokrat Parti | To | Debating the Restriction of Civil Liberties; Part 2 |
Message | Well, we do try.. |
Date | 21:59:37, November 19, 2007 CET | From | Secularist Socialist Party | To | Debating the Restriction of Civil Liberties; Part 2 |
Message | wow i dont belive that so many parties have voted yes to this. slavery allowed that mad! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 130 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 78 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady |