Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5475
Next month in: 01:15:40
Server time: 22:44:19, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2488

Details

Submitted by[?]: Constitutional Monarchy Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2489

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:53:40, November 19, 2007 CET
FromNational Socialist Imperialist League
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
MessageLike Hell I'm letting the Populists have Internal Affairs to themselves!

Date19:02:03, November 19, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
MessageWhat is wrong w the current cabinet? Why favor the LP over the NMrP?

Date19:12:40, November 19, 2007 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
MessagePDSP- what are you jabbering on about? Of course they will have it to themselves, they cannot share it! :S

PPP- The NMRP rarely vote the same as the Whigs on anything. The Liberals share Economic policey with us.

Date20:25:59, November 19, 2007 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
Message*policy

Date02:43:29, November 20, 2007 CET
FromNeo-Marxist revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
Messageooc: *shrugs* Our voting behaviour is more similar than that between the Whigs and Bailon Unity, it's 43%; with the NMrP it's 51%. According to the chart thingum anyway, although I think it's quite often wrong so meh.
(and yes I am writing this when I'm half asleep, can't you tell? ;p)

Date02:46:18, November 20, 2007 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
Message(ooc-to be realistic and true to ideological policy I thought that the NMRP were quite different, and it seems fine even if you are semi-conscious, i am the same lol)

Date03:29:01, November 20, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Beluzia and Bailon
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
MessageGuys, just call them the Revisionist Party... none of their adjectives apply. They've proven, multiple times, that they're not Marxist or revolutionary.

Date04:19:14, November 20, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
MessageThe LP has shown itself to be a communist tool, scarcely a "liberal" party by any "Classical" usage, while the N-MrP have at least been consistent thruout the years.

Date18:13:47, November 20, 2007 CET
FromNational Socialist Imperialist League
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
MessageI meant that I think the notion of the PPP having the possition of INternal Affairs, a very powerful one, is an absurd idea.

Date19:37:26, November 20, 2007 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2488
Messageooc- LOL
IC- they have managed internal affairs for a very long time. They are more than capable of that role, for they have done it on and off for at least 10 times the number of years you have been here.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 130

no
     

Total Seats: 498

abstain
  

Total Seats: 107


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76