Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 02:05:17
Server time: 13:54:42, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): dnobb | itsjustgav | JJOXICO | Kubrick2 | LC73DunMHP | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of July 2488

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Party Of My House

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2489

Description[?]:

The Free Party Of My House propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Free Republic of Dorvik.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:11:32, November 19, 2007 CET
FromFree Party Of My House
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageThis budget is more balanced, anyway we can debate this by the goverment parties and whatever support the new budget

Date20:29:08, November 19, 2007 CET
FromSupreme Party of the Republic
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageBigger budget=more taxes. more taxes=less job opportunities. less job opportunities=higher unemployment. Do we need to say that we're against this bill?

Date20:36:55, November 19, 2007 CET
FromFree Party Of My House
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageCurrently we have a surplus, and with this new budget we will mantain the surplus, but we will balance our budget and cut unemployment.

Date22:04:58, November 19, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageWe should not be reducing our defense budget at all.

Date22:48:48, November 19, 2007 CET
FromDorvik Socialist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageWe totally agree with this bill.

Date00:37:34, November 20, 2007 CET
FromFree Party Of My House
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageAny suggest of People's Progressive Party to get their affirmative vote ?

Date04:19:54, November 20, 2007 CET
FromDorvish Popular Front
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageWe oppose reducing defence spending.

Date05:22:41, November 20, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageOur Science and Technology budget should be left alone as well.

Date14:48:49, November 20, 2007 CET
FromSupreme Party of the Republic
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 2488
MessageWhy reduce Foreign Affairs?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 173

no
     

Total Seats: 326

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

Random quote: "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." - Winston Churchill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68