Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 00:58:17
Server time: 03:01:42, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Professional army, stronger Dorvik

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Party Of My House

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2489

Description[?]:

The Army of Dorvik should be professional and not mandatory, the principles of Freedom go first.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:38:59, November 21, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Professional army, stronger Dorvik
MessageArticle 3 needs to be changed to 'no citizen is required to serve in the military,' but overall it looks good

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 220

no
     

Total Seats: 279

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "The payment of taxes gives a right to protection." - James M. Wayne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62