We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police and Military Cooperation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Liberal Coalition
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2102
Description[?]:
| We agree that the police and military should be separated, but there are some times where events are too much for the police to handle themselves, whether because of lack of manpower or equipment. This bill only calls on the military IF the police needs it or in cases of serious emergencies (natural disasters, terrorist attacks, etc). |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:59:19, August 26, 2005 CET | From | Al'Badaran Bolshevik Movement (SC) | To | Debating the Police and Military Cooperation Act |
| Message | The Al'Badaran Bolshevik Movement wishes the military and police to be a single, superior force that will administer support and welfare to our people and who will aid in the destruction of enemy forces. Though this bill does not fulfill this goal, it brings us closer to it. Thus we give it our full support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 94 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 43 |
| Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |