Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 00:36:29
Server time: 19:23:30, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Dx6743 | HopesFor | LC73DunMHP | Paulo Nogueira | RogueALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Tax on cosmetic

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Sizpoao Communist Red Army

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2494

Description[?]:

Chemical based cosmetic products must be heavily tax, so that the use of lead chemical will be reduced.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:00:27, November 30, 2007 CET
FromGenuine Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Tax on cosmetic
MessageCosmetics with lead chemicals should not even be in the market in the first place. Also, don't all cosmetic products use chemicals (taking the term generally)? Unless of course if you classify cucumbers and papayas as cosmetic products.

We are sorry, but we find this resolution unjustifiable.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 85

no
      

Total Seats: 615

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law.

Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37