Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 01:19:26
Server time: 18:40:33, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ADM Drax | AethanKal | MyungJak | Paulo Nogueira | R Drax | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Immeressent Thinking

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likaton Coalition of the Willing

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2494

Description[?]:

We know you'll all vote for these fabulous proposals.

1> Lets get that old dead lady out of our anthem
2> Lets give our prefectures equal, fair billing
3> Let's not use nukes unless we really have to
4> Lets take the strain off our health service by letting the rich but their own
5> Lets let central government manage a co-ordinated 'Sport for All' policy.

Thank you very much, you've been a great convocation. We're here all week.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:23:37, November 30, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageWe're just gutted we couldn't vote twice!!!!!

Date22:35:06, November 30, 2007 CET
FromPermissive Social Union
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageWe would have supported if the national anthem was a Kazoo Solo.

Date22:36:17, November 30, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageWell, the anthem we proposed does have kazoo accompaniment in the original arrangement...

Date02:04:50, December 01, 2007 CET
FromNeue Kommunistische Liga
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageEh, only one wesupport, so...Sorry, but no.

Date05:50:55, December 01, 2007 CET
FromPermissive Social Union
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageA kazoo accompaniment is sufficient for us to support.

Date06:40:37, December 01, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageWhile we would have liked to supp... oh, who are we kidding. The advantage to smaller reasons is not only unexplained and illogical, but also - not what the Am II claimed in their flavour text. We could care less about most of the items, to be honest, but we see no rationale behind a constitutional amendment of this kind.

Date10:46:53, December 01, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageWe just feel that Meria is getting a rough deal; there aren't enough prefecture seats there to give it a fair voice...

Date14:11:03, December 01, 2007 CET
FromKapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
Message
We are ADAMANTLY opposed to #5, but 4 out of 5 is ok.

P.S.: While we do sympathize with the INJUSTICE that the voters in Meria are experiencing, we believe that the BEST solution would just be EQUAL representation.

Date16:10:51, December 01, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageThere is no injustice to Meria. If it has a fraction the number of citizens, it deserves a fraction of the elctoral seats. They may feel that Merian interests are not well represented... but giving them greater PROPORTIONAL representation means every other prefecture is less well represented... with less cause.

Date09:48:01, December 02, 2007 CET
FromKapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
Message[OOC]

TDP, we FINALLY agree on something (haha): that is that it is wrong to give people in Meria greater "proportional" representation when they have a smaller population.

That is why I am VIGOROUS supporter of BI-cameral legislatures in which the UPPER house would be based according to population while the LOWER house is based on EQUAL representation.

In this way, EVERYONE benefits (haha)!!!!

Date17:34:32, December 02, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Immeressent Thinking
MessageOn the other hand - we don't care about bicameral representation. We prefer the government of self by self. No cameral (bi, or otherwise) representation can ever represent the individual as well as the individual himself (or herself).

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 234

no
   

Total Seats: 214

abstain
  

Total Seats: 218


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "We’ve got to stand with our North Korean allies." - Sarah Palin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 89